Leading with the Cross
If you watch the famous Muhammad Ali/George Foreman bout, you will notice that Ali threw Foreman completely off his game by leading with a cross as opposed to leading with a jab. This completely threw Foreman off his game because he was clearly expecting the jab. From this, a number of propponents of leading with a cross have emerged, but this may not necessarily be the wisest of moves. Here are a few reasons why leading with a cross is not the most advisable options to undertake:
1.) The cross covers less distance than the jab.
2.) Th cross requirs too much commitment than th jab and requires a lot of form restructuring after being launched.
3.) You can't throw a cross effectively while moving to the degree the jab can.
And so on....
Yes, there are instances where leading with a cross can be valuable, but it would probably be best to stick with the jab as the lead punch most of the time.
1.) The cross covers less distance than the jab.
2.) Th cross requirs too much commitment than th jab and requires a lot of form restructuring after being launched.
3.) You can't throw a cross effectively while moving to the degree the jab can.
And so on....
Yes, there are instances where leading with a cross can be valuable, but it would probably be best to stick with the jab as the lead punch most of the time.

0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home